"What if it's not fixed? Why do some players run faster than others, jump, etc. Just don't write about skills )))"
The thing is: in order to OVC you need to deactivate / bypass EAC via Hacks. So why should someone use hacks to "ovc" if he is already "hacking" lulZ. Moronic isnt it?
"The game only loads on the second processor core."
So what? What do you try to tell us with this?
"Does it make sense for a warrock to have more than 4 cores?))"
Yes ofcourse. More cores = Load on your System gets split up more = less load on all cores = the core WR runs on has more resources / power for the Game.
"The thing is: in order to OVC you need to deactivate / bypass EAC via Hacks. So why should someone use hacks to "ovc" if he is already "hacking" lulZ. Moronic isnt it?"
Some players turn off EAC and you know it.
"Yes ofcourse. More cores = Load on your System gets split up more = less load on all cores = the core WR runs on has more resources / power for the Game."
You write based on logic and I write in practice. More than 4 cores means that it becomes more difficult to offload the second processor core. We'll have to greatly reduce the frequency of the processor. I tried it on different processors and I know what I am writing.
Moritz are you denying that 95-100% load on the second core is causing problems???????
Even if its possible to start the Game without EAC, the Server will kick any "non HGM" ranked account from the Game after like 60 secs (The Server sends a "is EAC active/running ?" request to everyones client and if EAC doesnt response (because deactivated?) the Client will get kicked from the Server - Admins are excluded from that request)
Your second point: Yes. If there is "no EAC" no one could get banned by EAC means OVC would be possible & Players / HGMs would have to record users like i did back at early PapayaPlay before EAC got added to the Game. Just take footage like this:
I think i know what N0hcm0 mean with the cores loading. With my 6700k/10850k before it was also loaded on core 1 and 2 default settings.
overclocking (no BLCK but with multipliers) it was fully loaded on core 1. but the registry felt better with load spread on more cores than single core fully focused.
Right now im on ryzen 7 5800x3d with 1 core fully loaded, but like everyone knows this game doesnt like amd that much.
Have you seen how the i7-6700 ovc through the bclk?
Windows TASK MANAGER does not see this overclocking, but the CPUZ sees it. 6700 6700k unique processor for overclocking bclk.
Windows task manager does not work correctly with the core on which the game is loaded.
For some reason, Windows loads this core with all programs. I will soon buy a processor 13900k with energy efficient cores and a with new Intel program THREAD DIRECTOR. These cores pull background programs onto themselves.
i dont think that i9 13900k is worth it for gaming only. the only difference with 13700k and 13900k is the E cores which is not really that important. (for atleat what i know).
Comments
i wont change anything on my setup just for a video lul.
6700k at 4.5 ghz with a 1080.
Make a video. Turn off hyperthreading.
Where the 7700K and 8700K processors?))
Does it make sense for a warrock to have more than 4 cores?))
i7-6700, i7-6700k unique bclk overclocking processor :) Maybe you use bclk ovc ? )) Ah ovc fixed xddddddd
Why would i do somth moronic as like to deactivate Hyperthreading? I use my PC not just for WarRock but for other Games too.
Nope, just basic ovc via multiplier. And yes. OVC via Software is fixed.
We're talking about warrock, moron, not other games.
We're talking about second core CPU usage.
The game only loads on the second processor core.
You are trying to manipulate and divert the topic in the other direction.
p.s. "No, just base ovc through a multiplier. And yes. OVC via software fixed."
What if it's not fixed? Why do some players run faster than others, jump, etc. Just don't write about skills )))
"What if it's not fixed? Why do some players run faster than others, jump, etc. Just don't write about skills )))"
The thing is: in order to OVC you need to deactivate / bypass EAC via Hacks. So why should someone use hacks to "ovc" if he is already "hacking" lulZ. Moronic isnt it?
"The game only loads on the second processor core."
So what? What do you try to tell us with this?
"Does it make sense for a warrock to have more than 4 cores?))"
Yes ofcourse. More cores = Load on your System gets split up more = less load on all cores = the core WR runs on has more resources / power for the Game.
"The thing is: in order to OVC you need to deactivate / bypass EAC via Hacks. So why should someone use hacks to "ovc" if he is already "hacking" lulZ. Moronic isnt it?"
Some players turn off EAC and you know it.
"Yes ofcourse. More cores = Load on your System gets split up more = less load on all cores = the core WR runs on has more resources / power for the Game."
You write based on logic and I write in practice. More than 4 cores means that it becomes more difficult to offload the second processor core. We'll have to greatly reduce the frequency of the processor. I tried it on different processors and I know what I am writing.
Moritz are you denying that 95-100% load on the second core is causing problems???????
moritz 4 cores 3.6ghz and 60-139 fps better than permanent 139 fps :)
Remember moritz as 2x2=4 what does a full load of the second processor core do UNREG HITS :)
I played without lag besides. If I played with a lag you would cry :))
When all the players attention to the CPU load, you will cry in every game.
ThxBro is Eriick. Not me. Lul.
eriick,shrek and you same for me EZZZ
Your the processor and bclk overclocking :)
Task Manager only sees 4GHz and CPUz 4.4GHz.
How do you make ovc WARROCK? :)
This is possible if papaya is not a publisher
But my Taskmanager shows 4.5 Ghz 🤷♂️
Running like this since i bough the PC:
https://valid.x86.fr/kpslrv
It's useless to write anything to you.
Oh you asked "How do you make ovc WARROCK? :)"
By increasing the BCLK via Software. Not via Bios. And as we know: To Clock via Software will lead to a ban.
That is, if I programmatically overclock the bclk, then I will get a ban. EAC will block the account? Is that what you want to say?
Thats what should happen in theory jup.
But in practice who blocks for OVC? EAC or HGM?
EAC
1.possible to turn on the game without EAC?
2.If there is no EAC then OVC is possible?
Even if its possible to start the Game without EAC, the Server will kick any "non HGM" ranked account from the Game after like 60 secs (The Server sends a "is EAC active/running ?" request to everyones client and if EAC doesnt response (because deactivated?) the Client will get kicked from the Server - Admins are excluded from that request)
Your second point: Yes. If there is "no EAC" no one could get banned by EAC means OVC would be possible & Players / HGMs would have to record users like i did back at early PapayaPlay before EAC got added to the Game. Just take footage like this:
Back to the Topic. In order to "OVC" the only way is to bypass EAC via Cheats. Run Cheats in order to OVC - sounds kinda moronic doesnt it lul
I think i know what N0hcm0 mean with the cores loading. With my 6700k/10850k before it was also loaded on core 1 and 2 default settings.
overclocking (no BLCK but with multipliers) it was fully loaded on core 1. but the registry felt better with load spread on more cores than single core fully focused.
Right now im on ryzen 7 5800x3d with 1 core fully loaded, but like everyone knows this game doesnt like amd that much.
I also have a pc with AMD RYZEN 5700G. With 3200 MHz CL14 RAM and a bus running 1.1,
I get the same FPS as on an Intel processor.
The bios ram and bus settings are very important for amd.
Have you seen how the i7-6700 ovc through the bclk?
Windows TASK MANAGER does not see this overclocking, but the CPUZ sees it. 6700 6700k unique processor for overclocking bclk.
Windows task manager does not work correctly with the core on which the game is loaded.
For some reason, Windows loads this core with all programs. I will soon buy a processor 13900k with energy efficient cores and a with new Intel program THREAD DIRECTOR. These cores pull background programs onto themselves.
Maybe this will help the game.
strange, the 5800x3d doesnt really need good ram. but even then i have 3600mhz 14-14-14-34 running 1.1
my ram sticks: F4-3600C14D-32GTZRA
You have perfect memory for amd
exactly but still have fps drops. even my 5600x was better.
Gonna change cpu to 13700k this month or next month
I think in a couple of months 13700k will cost 350 euros. He is now €440 .
13900k is 200 euros more expensive. €640
If the warrock will not load the second core at 100% 13700k will be good for the game.
I'll wait for your screen with 13700k :)
i dont think that i9 13900k is worth it for gaming only. the only difference with 13700k and 13900k is the E cores which is not really that important. (for atleat what i know).
If i have the 13700k i will post some screens
For me there is a difference. I am using intel UHD graphics. It is a little faster at 13900k.
36 MB Intel Smart Cache more, more t-boost.
The top processor is always more interesting.
In any case, I will try to buy 13900k no more than 550 euros.